The news these days has been just dominated by speculation over what, if anything, the U.S. should do about the growing “crisis” in Iraq. For those who’ve been living under a rock, the crisis revolves around the murderous advance, through Iraq, of the group known as ISIS (The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria), a fanatical offshoot of Al-Qaeda, whose apparent aim is to create the world’s first terrorism-derived Islamic state across the Sunni areas of Iraq and Syria. This group is so extreme that even the leadership of Al-Qaeda itself has purportedly expressed disapproval of their tactics!
The amazing thing, to me at least, is that many of the “talking heads” on the news are seriously suggesting that getting involved in that mess might actually be in our best interests. Really? Are you fucking kidding me? Even before reading the brilliant Iraq and the Pottery Barn rule post Pied Type did on the subject yesterday, I had already decided that our getting involved was a “lose-lose” proposition for us, but, if I did have any residual fantasies at all about our being able to do some good there, they were completely squashed after seeing the following report on last night’s Rachel Maddow show:
Look, I get that no one likes a bully. Who the hell does? And, being a member of several of the world’s smallest minorities myself, I can certainly appreciate the urge to stop the majority from throwing its monstrous weight around. But when you consider that, in a world where Sunnis make up, by far, the largest percentage of the Muslim population, it just stands to reason that most of what we count as “friends” in the Islamic world are probably Sunni as well. From a Geo-political strategy standpoint, that a fact that simply cannot be ignored.
However, in the scenario currently playing out in Iraq, it’s that Sunni majority that’s actually playing the role of “the bully,” while the Shiite “little guys” we’re being called on to “defend” are represented by Iraq’s “puppet in charge” Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and Syria’s “mass-murdering” President Bashar al-Assad, the very people we’ve been pushing to replace for years. And, to make things even more complicated, the “little guys” are backed by the region’s ultimate bad actor, Iran!
So, while our stupid decision to invade Iraq in 2003 might have broken things a little more than they already were, the fact is that we merely stepped into a “Mesopotamian crap pile” that has existed for far longer than the U.S. has even been around. How anyone can think that wallowing in that pile even more can be in our best interest is simply beyond me. As far as I’m concerned, we’ve already expended far more than it was worth in our attempts to “fix” the Middle East.
If having played a role in helping to “break” things justifies wasting even more of our people’s lives, our treasure, and our prestige on such a hopeless cause, then we all might as well just slit our wrists and get it over with!
I want ice water.
More from the Major Rants volume